I recently came across what I consider to be a bad use of technology for the B2B service provider. It is a case of using technology to conduct a “conversation” that needs to happen verbally, not electronically. Here’s the case.
A SaaS provider of billing software for B2B service providers has a feature in their software that allows the service provider’s clients to login and view activity. Fine. I suppose that some clients would see this as added benefit. However, the software service also allows the client to log into the system and mark an invoice as “disputed”. This is a bad business practice for the B2B professional on a number of levels.
First off, this practice leads the client to believe that by physically marking the invoice disputed, there is some chance that they will not need to pay the invoice. The shear physical act contributes to a future expectation that will need to be managed soon.
Most tragically, though, the act of allowing a client to mark an invoice “disputed”, does not address the fundamental problem. The problem being a breakdown in care for the client or a breakdown in understanding of the Conditions of Satisfaction . This is a conversation that should never be had via electronic means. Email exchanges are bad enough. The marking of an invoice as disputed, takes this practice to a very bad place.
This practice is no different than your customer taking a printing invoice, stamping “Disputed” on it, and mailing it back to you. Imagine how you would feel if that happened. Can you feel the animosity building?
As professionals, it is our job to set the proper expectations with clients. One of those expectations should be the method the client will use for communicating any dissatisfaction with our services. Until phones cease to exist, phone calls or in person conversations must be the method. The client / consultant relationship is too important to trust to electronic means. Voice to voice, interactive communication is key to understanding the depth of the problem and devising the solution. Voice inflection, tone, degree, and give and take cannot be deduced by a carte blanche marking of the invoice by the client.
Your thoughts?
To your success!
Scott

follow scott on twitter